Powered By
widgetmate.com
Sponsored By
Digital Camera

Viewed best in Firefox

Ο διάνοια ξέρει την ιδέα μέσω της εικόνας
"The intellect knows the idea through the image," Aristotle, De Anima, III, 7
Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts

Thursday, January 31, 2008

* Religion is Deadly

The unbelievably sad and tragic story of Jaswinder 'Jassi' Kaur Sidhu (Canadian) and her husband Mittoo Singh Sidhu (Punjab, India) was aired again on CNN last night. The 25-year old Jassi married for love instead of accepting the 61-year old man chosen for her by her mother and uncle who had her killed for disobedience. Their tradition was more important than Jassi. Indian authorities say that Jassi's uncle and mother got away with murder.

CBC Timeline
The Province
Wikipedia

See post: The Origins of Religious Violence by Nick Gier and his book-in-progress.

Sunday, December 02, 2007

* Why I Hate December ... to be continued.

Already, even before Thanksgiving!


1. My movie channels are full of Christmas garbage, sickly sweet junk unconnected to real life.

2. Radio stations play Christmas music, if you call that "music." I do not.

3. The shelves that I frequent at Home Depot have Christmas junk on them instead of the items I need.

4. Christmas is everywhere. Why does it overwhelm everything including other holidays:


December 5 - Hanukkah* (Jewish)

December 22 - Winter Solstice (Dec 22-Mar 20)

December 26
- Kwanzaa (African-American - Dec. 26, 2005 - Jan 1, 2006)

5. Many people assume that I celebrate Christmas.

6. Christmas is supposedly a religious holiday. Religion should be private and not stuffed down the throats of those who don't want it.

7. TV and radio news is crammed with Christmas hints and recipes to help "you" enjoy "your" holiday even if you want nothing to do with it.

~ BlogHer

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

* International Humanist News

Fighting for the Rights of the Non-Religious

| |

The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) annual meeting on democratic institutions and human rights, held in Warsaw in September 2007, started with sessions on tolerance and freedom of religion and belief.. There were many contributors speaking on behalf of religious organisations, but the interests of the non-religious were represented only by the European Humanist Federation (EHF) and the British Humanist Association (BHA).

Strenuous efforts are now being made by religious leaders at the international level to attack secularism and to protect religions against so-called “defamation”. No satisfactory definition of “defamation of religion” has been advanced, but secularists fear that this is simply an attempt to limit the right to criticise religion and abuses carried out or justified in its name. Although the initiative for this attack on free speech originated with Muslim leaders and groups, who coined the term“Islamophobia”, the Roman Catholic Church and other churches in Europe have leapt enthusiastically onto the bandwagon with accusations of “Christianophobia”. Religious groups, which already have privileged positions, and some of which vigorously suppress opposition when they are in positions of power, are now trying to cast themselves as victims.

For example, the OSCE meeting heard the following contribution from Vatican representative, Monsignor Anthony R. Frontiero:

Demonizing Christianity, or deliberately mocking and undermining central tenets of the Christian faith as a means to promoting the rights of other groups is a clear and flagrant contradiction to the religious freedom and mutual respect that all people should enjoy, not to mention to the work of building a more just and peaceful community. Such practices must be seen for what they are: a subversive attempt to dismantle the progress made thus far in the promotion of tolerance and non-discrimination.

This resembles some of the comments we have seen in the wake of the Danish, and now Swedish, cartoons of Muhammad. Yes, they argue, of course free speech must be upheld, but it must not go so far as to offend the sensibilities of religious believers. If it does, it is an attack on the human right of freedom of religion! “Respect” must be automatically accorded to religious beliefs and believers.

In fact, away from the rarefied atmosphere of international conferences, religious leaders are often anything but respectful towards other religions. (This is hardly surprising in view of their conflicting doctrines.) An extreme example is found in Saudi Arabia, where no religion other than Islam is allowed to be preached or practised. And freedom of religion has little meaning in countries that still maintain a law against blasphemy or even apostasy.

When it comes to atheists, agnostics and Humanists, almost no holds are barred. At the OSCE Conference, Vera Pegna of the EHF called attention to the fact that hate crimes were always preceded by hate language which, in turn, preceded and fed prejudice and stereotypes. The widespread use of hate language and stereotypes against Jews in Europe had justified centuries of persecution and made the Holocaust possible. A similar smear campaign against the non-religious had been going on for over 20 centuries and was still current.

In a submission on behalf of the BHA, Hanne Stinson also took up this theme, referring to the Catholic Catechism and to the rhetoric and death threats emanating from some Muslim groups, in particular against apostates. She also instanced the many well-respected and moderate religious leaders who regularly declared that there could be no morality without religion, or who linked secularism with Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot.

Hanne pointed out that, in work of the OSCE and many countries on social cohesion and inclusion, the focus tended to be on faith, faith communities, and faith leaders (who were rarely truly representative of the people they claimed to represent), and on interfaith and multi-faith considerations. We certainly had a multicultural society, and a pluralist society, but our society did not only include a variety of different faiths, but also a large number of people with non-religious beliefs. If we wished to work on social cohesion and address exclusion, hatred and hate crime, we needed to involve the whole community, not just the religious.

David Pollock of the EHF made a similar point in his submission, which is reproduced as one of the succeeding articles.

Diana Brown is the current editor of International Humanist News

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

* Eyes on Darfur via Satellite Images ~ Breaking News, Reuters/Amnesty International


Amnesty International: Eyes on Darfur

Reuters: A screenshot of EyesOnDarfur.org, taken on June 6, 2007. Amnesty International started posting satellite images on the Internet of villages in Sudan's conflict-ravaged Darfur on Wednesday in a bid to pressure Khartoum to allow U.N. peacekeepers into the region...

"We expect the Sudanese government to protect these and all villages throughout Darfur," said Ariela Blatter, director of Amnesty USA's Crisis Prevention and Response Center, who led the development of the Eyes on Darfur project. "We expect these villages to be intact today, tomorrow and well, well into the future."

Read Report on 2006

Sunday, June 03, 2007

* Let's build an international secular movement! ~ by Azar Majedi

Azar Majedi is a veteran women’s rights activist from Iran. Victim of political Islam and president of the Organisation for Women's Liberation, Azar Majedi calls for international support and solidarity in the battle for freedom and equality.

Majedi writes: Religion is not only an oppressive institution, suppressing freedom of thought, speech and criticism and oppressing women. It is also the machinery for terrorizing societies. In the history of mankind, more people have died under the name of the God, than any other ideology or cause. In fact religion is a mafia-liken institution.

And the Lord your God said ...

Sunday, April 15, 2007

* Bush Troop Surge Not Working ~ Why are We not Surprised? ~ What Can We Do?

Not only are there 3,301 US military deaths resulting from the Iraq war as of today, there are perhaps half a million Iraqi civilian deaths The Lancet.

Follow current news, Iraq Today

Red Cross Warns "Disastrous," “Immense” Iraqi Humanitarian Crisis "Ever-Worsening"

Democracy Now!

April 12, 2007

"The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is warning that the conflict in Iraq is inflicting immense suffering on the entire population and is steadily getting worse. The Red Cross says “civilians are bearing the brunt of the relentless violence and the extremely poor security conditions that are disrupting the lives and livelihoods of millions.”
What can we do?

Stay Educated, e.g., Peace Action

Sign Petitions

Donate, if Possible

Prepare for Voting

Speak Up


Get Involved


Other suggestions will be welcomed ...

Monday, April 09, 2007

* Today's Annual White House Easter Egg Hunt Complete with Activist Groups Hunting Bombs

ABC News
by NATASHA T. METZER


WASHINGTON Apr 9, 2007 (AP)— Thousands of kids dressed for winter weather scrambled for eggs Easter eggs, that is at a White House ceremony dating back to the 19th century

The annual White House Easter Egg Roll, started by President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1878, typically has been a rite of spring in Washington. But on Monday, it was afflicted by winter's parting bite cold air and even colder grounds. Undaunted by any of this, the young guests sprang into action under the watchful eyes of their families, hostess Laura Bush and several Bush administration Cabinet secretaries.

"In Washington, we know spring has arrived when the White House lawn is filled with children for the Easter Egg Roll, one of the happiest traditions here at the White House," the first lady said. . ."

"Across from the White House, meanwhile, a handful of activists at Lafayette Park hunted for brightly colored tennis balls in an alternative "Easter cluster bomb hunt," intended to dramatize the fact that many areas of the globe, such as South Lebanon, are not safe for children because of persistent fighting and unexploded munitions.

"What we're really trying to get across is that all children should be able to have fun like this and not be worried about getting blown up," said Brian Hennessey, from the Vineeta Foundation, one of the organizers."

Bomb hunt at Lafayette Park, across from the White House, sponsored by the Vineeta Foundation, Code Pink, DAWN, Voters for Peace, Fellowship of Reconciliation, Coalition for Justice and Accountability, Democracy Rising, US Campaign to End the Occupation, Backbone Campaign, After Downing St, Iran Coalition and Jewish Voices For Peace

Sunday, March 25, 2007

* Confining Religion to Private Thought, What a Great Idea! ~ England's New Morality

British House of Lords Votes on Equality Act (Sexual Orientation Regulations) 2007, Raises Serious Implications for Christian Believers

ASSIST News Service

by Michael Ireland,
Chief Correspondent

March 23, 2007

LONDON, ENGLAND (ANS) -- The vote by 168 to 122 in the British House of Lord's on March 21 in favor of the Government's Equality Act (Sexual Orientation Regulations) 2007 marks the imposition of a new morality, according to the website Christian Concern for our Nation (CCFON), which is a project of the Lawyers Christian Fellowship in the United Kingdom.

An e-mail media release says: "It is a clear sign that despite saying they were going to consult and listen the Government has failed to respect the consciences of citizens whose values are formed and shaped by their deeply held religious beliefs, be they Christian, Muslim or Jewish. This could have been easily resolved by a simple conscience clause."

The e-mail states: "In a week where the whole country celebrates the 200th anniversary of the Abolition of Slavery, brought about, by and large, through the determined efforts of William Wilberforce, we would do well to remember his driving force and motivation stemmed from his Christian conviction. History will record that today's vote marked the increased secularization of Britain confining faith to private thought, rather than public manifestation in works of service for the whole community."

It adds: "The consequences and implications of the SORs will unfold month by month. The result of the vote will mean that rather than balancing rights, the right to live a homosexual lifestyle will trump the right to live a Christian lifestyle." Read more ...
Christian Concern for our Nation (CCFON) has set up a petition page to Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II against "the imposition of a new morality" in England. It is written there:

"Are you concerned for our nation? Many laws impacting on Christians’ day-to-day lives go against biblical values. And more are being passed every year by the Government. For example, there are currently discussions in Parliament about laws relating to:

* Reducing freedom to preach the gospel
* Legalising euthanasia
* Making abortions more easily available

"Christian Concern for our Nation (CCFON) is an activity of the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship Public Policy Unit. It is a service for non-lawyers who want to be equipped to understand, act and respond to the increasing number of legal issues impacting the Gospel and Biblical justice at the heart of our society. CCFON consists of a website and e-mail update service supported by an active team of lawyers.

"More and more it seems Christians are rejecting the apathy which has so often kept the Church silent. We realise both the need and the power of uniting together and making our voices heard. The call to Christians is to stand up for values God expresses in the Bible. If we don’t, no-one else will."
Maybe it's not just England but all of Europe that's losing its faith, fears Pope Benedict XVI.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

* Artist's Work Destroyed by Russian Orthodox Churchgoers

Russian-born artist, Alexander Kosolapov, has lived and worked in New York City since 1975 where he has been influenced by Andy Warhol's work. These three pieces are among some of Kosolapov's work that indignant Russian Orthodox churchgoers either damaged, destroyed, or removed from exhibits.



Russian lawsuit testing limits of free expression

by Erika Niedowski,
Sun Foreign Reporter

March 23, 2007

MOSCOW: "Oleg Kassin objected to them all: the portrait of a robed Jesus Christ, his face replaced by a Mickey Mouse head, among his disciples; an icon of a halo-adorned Virgin Mary done in dots made to look like caviar; the photo of a crouched woman in a brassiere, thong and high-heeled boots with her rear to the camera [at the Andrei Sakharov Museum].

"So he and the Russian Orthodox church group to which he belongs went to court this week, claiming not just questionable artistic taste, but an outright crime.

"For the second time in recent years, an exhibit at the Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Center has become the object of a legal fight here and a touchstone for debate on the right to - and limits of - free expression in Russia, which, as it turns out, often comes at a cost."
...

"The problem is, they don't want to discuss it," he [the museum's curator, Yerofeyev] said of the Tretyakov's leadership. "They simply say it's forbidden. Maybe they are right; some things should be forbidden. But there should be arguments, professional ones."

The Russian Orthodox church group charges the museum with inciting religious and ethnic hatred. The first time this happened was in March 2005:

Beware of Religion: a Rebirth of Militant Atheism in Moscow

Russian Orthodox Church

by Dmitry Ageev
March 23, 2005

"The exhibition «Beware of religion!» opened in the exhibition hall of the Andrei Sakharov museum in Moscow on January 14, 2003, where a group of artists presented works that were meant to «draw attention to the hypocritical role of religion in the contemporary world». Among these works were: an imitation of a large icon of Christ with a road sign instead of a face; an imitation of an icon of Christ with openings for the face and hands, through which visitors were invited to place their corresponding body parts and be photographed; a billboard with a Coca-Cola logo, depiction of Christ and the inscription «This is My Blood»; a cross covered with garlands of sausages; ... " Read more
While some people may have found the "Caution! Religion" exhibition offensive, Amnesty International does not believe that any of the exhibits portrayed on the Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Centre's website amounted to an incitement to violence. Moreover, the use in this case of Article 282 of the Russian Criminal Code – which is in the section of the criminal code listing crimes against the state – is wholly disproportionate.
Dr. Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov (Russian: Андре́й Дми́триевич Са́харов) (May 21, 1921 – December 14, 1989) was an eminent Soviet nuclear physicist, dissident and human rights activist. Sakharov was an advocate of civil liberties and reforms in the Soviet Union and was the first Russian to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

In 2005 the Russian Orthodox church wrote, "The exhibition’s organizers who shamed the name of A. Sakharov, himself the grandson of an Orthodox priest, should be severely punished."

The real shame is that we are not surprised at the destruction of an artist's work by Christians.

As to how Dr. Sakharov might respond, "... religion did not play an important role in his life, though he did believe that a non-scientific "guiding principle" governed the universe and human life."* As a champion for human rights and civil liberties I think that Dr. Sakharov would agree with Amnesty International.

* Drell, Sidney D., and Sergei P. Kapitsa (eds.), Sakharov Remembered, pp. 3, 92. New York: Springer, 1991.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

* Angelina Jolie ~ Humanitarian Awards Winner, Goodwill Ambassador, Godless Goddess

March is Women's History Month
There doesn't need to be a God for me. There's something in people that's spiritual, that's godlike. I don't feel like doing things just because people say things, but I also don't really know if it's better to just not believe in anything, either. ~ Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie visits camp in Chad to assess situation for Darfur refugees


BAHAI, Chad, February 27, 2007 - UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador Angelina Jolie on Tuesday completed a two-day mission to a refugee camp in eastern Chad which enabled her to assess how the security situation has deteriorated for Sudanese refugees since her last visit to Chad three years ago ...continued
Instead of attending the Academy Awards, Angelina Jolie (also an actress) was in Africa to visit refugee camps and raise awareness about the continuing devastation in Darfur. At only 31, Jolie's humanitarian outreach resume--that began in 2001--is voluminous. Not only has she given of herself but has donated millions for various issues and needs around the world.

Also see E! Online

Sunday, February 25, 2007

* Governmental Violations of Free Speech Rights Couldn't Happen in the US? You Decide

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL ~ Backtrack to Egypt

Egypt: Karim Amer sentence makes bloggers new target of the authorities

Press Release
February 22, 2007


"Amnesty International condemns the four-year sentence handed down by an Egyptian court today against blogger Karim Amer, and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."

"Karim Amer is the first Egyptian blogger to be tried for writing blogs criticizing Egypt's al-Azhar religious authorities, President Husni Mubarak and Islam. Charges against him included 'spreading information disruptive of public order and damaging to the country’s reputation,' 'incitement to hate Islam' and 'defaming the President of the Republic.'"

See also The Herald, Scotland
A less extreme curtailment of free speech may be occuring here in the USA. The Department of Defense, supposedly worried about national security issues, has shut down blogs written by soldiers about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A lawsuit against the Department of Defense is pending.

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF): Defending Freedom in the Digital World

Surveillance of Soldiers' Blogs Sparks EFF Lawsuit: Defense Department Withholds Records About Army Blog Monitoring Program
January 31, 2007


Washington, D.C. - "The FLAG Project at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed suit against the Department of Defense today, demanding expedited information on how the Army monitors soldiers' blogs.

"According to news reports, an Army unit called the Army Web Risk Assessment Cell (AWRAC) reviews hundreds of thousands of websites every month, notifying webmasters and bloggers when it sees information it finds inappropriate. Some bloggers have told reporters that they have cut back on their posts or shut down their sites altogether because of the activities of the AWRAC. EFF filed its suit after the Department of Defense and Army failed to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests about the blog monitoring program.

"Soldiers should be free to blog their thoughts at this critical point in the national debate on the war in Iraq," said EFF Staff Attorney Marcia Hofmann. "If the Army is coloring or curtailing soldiers' published opinions, Americans need to know about that interference."

The book, The Blog of War by Matthew Currier Burden, former Major US Army is the work of over 50 American military bloggers "who tell their stories about the experiences around the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan."


The Washington Post wrote of the book, The Blog of War, "...nonpartisan patriotism is the common thread tying together these reflections, love letters and stories of combat. They make for riveting reading."

Vanity Fair suggested, "Grab it before the Pentagon orders it burned..."

The Blog of War blog mentions the DoD's blog "shut down" and "after the Jump" by the military.

Friday, January 26, 2007

* The Homophobic Catholic Church is at it Again

Reposted from Richard Dawkin's Website

Send The God Delusion to your MP

by J. Christie
PledgeBank.com

"I will Arrange my MP to receive a copy of Richard Dawkins' book "The God Delusion" but only if 645 other people (one per UK constituency) will do the same for other MPs." ~ J. Christie

Deadline to sign up by: 31st March 2007

Country: United Kingdom

More details:

The head of the UK Catholic Church has today (23 January 2007) asked the UK parliament to exempt Catholic adoption agencies from being forced to consider equally, applications from homosexual couples.

I do not believe the church should be given special status. Catholics, like everyone else in the country, should play by the rules. Faith should not exempt one from being guilty of discrimination.

Richard Dawkins, as Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, is best placed to make this argument, and his book "The God Delusion" (costing 11 pounds online) does it convincingly.

I will buy a copy, and have it delivered to my own MP. Should this pledge gain momentum, I additionally undertake to maintain a simple online list of MP's (and their addresses) for whom pledges have been received, to eliminate duplication of effort. ~ J. Christie

Sign up at:
PledgeBank
Cross-reference METAXY

* The Monetary Cost of the War in Iraq in Perspective


CodePink: A Reason to Support the March on Washington, D.C., January 27-29, 2007

"President Bush's State of the Union address only drives home why we need to take to the streets this Saturday. As much as he spoke of "hope and opportunity" for America's future Tuesday night, Bush is squandering our truest hopes and opportunities by funneling so much money into an unnecessary war.

"This recent graphic in the NY Times highlights how recklessly our tax dollars are being used. We are pouring $200 billion dollars into the war in Iraq, while universal health care for everyone in the country without insurance would cost just half that amount. Universal preschool would only cost our country $35 billion. Immunizing the entire world's children against diseases such as measles and diphtheria would cost $0.6 billion."

New York Times Graphic ...

Other reasons and some of the sponsors of the march:

United For Peace and Justice
A.N.S.W.E.R.
Progressive Democrats of America
Democrats.com

METAXY War Casualties in Iraq,
US and Iraqi
and,

$ Cost of War

Monday, January 15, 2007

* Beyond Iraq, in Honor of the Birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Civil Rights Leader ~ January 15, 1929 – April 4, 1968

Parallels are being observed nowadays between the Vietnam war and Iraq. What Dr. King said in this speech can apply to the war in Iraq in many ways.

Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence

by Rev. Martin Luther King
4 April 1967


[Excerpts]

"I come to this platform tonight to make a passionate plea to my beloved nation. ..."

"And as I ponder the madness of Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond to compassion my mind goes constantly to the people of that peninsula. I speak now not of the soldiers of each side, not of the junta in Saigon, but simply of the people who have been living under the curse of war for almost three continuous decades now. I think of them too because it is clear to me that there will be no meaningful solution there until some attempt is made to know them and hear their broken cries.

They must see Americans as strange liberators. ..."

"The only change came from America as we increased our troop commitments in support of governments which were singularly corrupt, inept and without popular support. All the while the people read our leaflets and received regular promises of peace and democracy -- and land reform. Now they languish under our bombs and consider us -- not their fellow Vietnamese --the real enemy. They move sadly and apathetically as we herd them off the land of their fathers into concentration camps where minimal social needs are rarely met. They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs. So they go -- primarily women and children and the aged.

"They watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as the bulldozers roar through their areas preparing to destroy the precious trees. They wander into the hospitals, with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one "Vietcong"-inflicted injury. So far we may have killed a million of them -- mostly children. They wander into the towns and see thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals. They see the children, degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They see the children selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their mothers.

"We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. We have cooperated in the crushing of the nation's only non-Communist revolutionary political force -- the unified Buddhist church. We have supported the enemies of the peasants of Saigon. We have corrupted their women and children and killed their men. What liberators?

"Now there is little left to build on -- save bitterness. Soon the only solid physical foundations remaining will be found at our military bases and in the concrete of the concentration camps we call fortified hamlets. The peasants may well wonder if we plan to build our new Vietnam on such grounds as these? Could we blame them for such thoughts? We must speak for them and raise the questions they cannot raise. These too are our brothers. ..."

"Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. ..."

"This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death. ..."

"The world now demands a maturity of America that we may not be able to achieve. It demands that we admit that we have been wrong from the beginning of our adventure in Vietnam, that we have been detrimental to the life of the Vietnamese people. The situation is one in which we must be ready to turn sharply from our present ways.

"In order to atone for our sins and errors in Vietnam, we should take the initiative in bringing a halt to this tragic war. I would like to suggest five concrete things that our government should do immediately to begin the long and difficult process of extricating ourselves from this nightmarish conflict:

1. End all bombing in North and South Vietnam.
2. Declare a unilateral cease-fire in the hope that such action will create the atmosphere for negotiation.
3. Take immediate steps to prevent other battlegrounds in Southeast Asia by curtailing our military buildup in Thailand and our interference in Laos.
4. Realistically accept the fact that the National Liberation Front has substantial support in South Vietnam and must thereby play a role in any meaningful negotiations and in any future Vietnam government.
5. Set a date that we will remove all foreign troops from Vietnam in accordance with the 1954 Geneva agreement.

"Part of our ongoing commitment might well express itself in an offer to grant asylum to any Vietnamese who fears for his life under a new regime which included the Liberation Front. Then we must make what reparations we can for the damage we have done. We must provide the medical aid that is badly needed, making it available in this country if necessary. ..."

"At this point I should make it clear that while I have tried in these last few minutes to give a voice to the voiceless on Vietnam and to understand the arguments of those who are called enemy, I am as deeply concerned about our troops there as anything else. For it occurs to me that what we are submitting them to in Vietnam is not simply the brutalizing process that goes on in any war where armies face each other and seek to destroy. We are adding cynicism to the process of death, for they must know after a short period there that none of the things we claim to be fighting for are really involved. Before long they must know that their government has sent them into a struggle among Vietnamese, and the more sophisticated surely realize that we are on the side of the wealthy and the secure while we create hell for the poor. ..."

"We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. The "tide in the affairs of men" does not remain at the flood; it ebbs. We may cry out deperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is deaf to every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residue of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late." There is an invisible book of life that faithfully records our vigilance or our neglect. "The moving finger writes, and having writ moves on..." We still have a choice today; nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation.

"We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world -- a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act we shall surely be dragged down the long dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.

"Now let us begin. Now let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter -- but beautiful -- struggle for a new world ... The choice is ours, and though we might prefer it otherwise we must choose in this crucial moment of human history."

To read the entire speech ...

CNN Special on Dr. King and The Martin Luther King Papers

Dr. King ~ Wikipedia

Photo from CodePink

Sunday, December 10, 2006

* Nobel Peace Prize Winner Calls Poverty a Threat to World Peace

by Lisa Bryant
Paris
10 December 2006

"Bangladeshi economist Muhammed Yunus called poverty a fundamental threat to peace as he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway.

Yunus said, ""We are creating a completely new generation that will be well equipped to take their families out of the reach of poverty. We want to make a break with the historical continuation of poverty."

Yunus also warned, "poverty generates hostility and anger, and that peace is impossible where poverty exists."

Hermann Muhammed Yunus, A Modern Ghandi

* International Human Rights Day ~ December 10

Voice of America News
Human Rights Day Focuses On Poverty Eradication


by Lisa Schlein
Geneva
10 December 2006

The United Nations is calling on governments to urgently come to grips with poverty and end the discrimination that systematically deprives poor people of their fundamental human rights. Lisa Schlein reports for VOA from Geneva on this year's theme for Human Rights Day Sunday.

The United Nations chose poverty as this year's theme for Human Rights day because, it says, poverty is both a cause and a product of human rights violations. It says the poor are more likely to have their rights denied, and to be victims of discrimination and persecution.

Mac Darrow, of the U.N. Human Rights Office, says that over the last decade, poverty has come to be seen as a human rights issue, rather than just an economic issue. He says, research shows poor people suffer from a wide-range of civil and political rights violations. "Lack of access to adequate schooling. Lack of personal security. Lack of ability to participate in public affairs or community level decision-making bodies - really, a very integrated and multi-faceted vision of dis-empowerment. And, this and like research has driven international development agencies to understand poverty as precisely that, as about social exclusion, about issues of access to political power, economic power and discrimination," he said.

Darrow, who coordinates the Millennium Development Goals for the Human Rights office, says it is not easy for people to see poverty as a human rights violation equivalent to gross abuses such as torture, forced disappearances or summary executions.
Rather, he says poverty is perceived as tragic, but inevitable. He says poor people often are blamed for their own situation, and are accused of being lazy and undeserving.

The United Nations says poverty is part of a vicious cycle that tends to repeat itself from one generation to another. It says poverty exists everywhere, even in rich countries. It says women suffer most from being poor.

As part of the U.N.'s Millennium Development Goals, countries have pledged to eradicate extreme poverty by 2015. The U.N. says time is running out on this pledge, and urges governments to speed up the process. It says eradicating poverty is a human right.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations on December 10, 1948, in the aftermath of World War II. In 1966, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural rights came into being. Together, these three rights treaties constitute the International Bill of Rights. International Human Rights Day celebrates this achievement.

Human Rights Day 2006
Fighting Poverty
A Matter of Obligation
Not Charity


National Human Rights Institute

All About International
Human Rights Day and This
Year's Focus on Poverty (PDF)


Amnesty International

Sunday, November 26, 2006

* The Privatization of God ~ Jorge Majfud & Blaise Pascal

The Privatization of God
by Jorge Majfud

Custom-made for the consumer

In the 17th century, the mathematics genius Blaise Pascal wrote that men never do evil with greater pleasure than when they do it with religious conviction. This idea – from a deeply religious man – has taken a variety of different forms since. During the last century, the greatest crimes against humanity were promoted, with pride and passion, in the name of Progress, of Justice and of Freedom. In the name of Love, Puritans and moralists organized hatred, oppression and humiliation; in the name of Life, leaders and prophets spilled death over vast regions of the planet. Presently, God has come to be the main excuse for exercises in hate and death, hiding political ambitions, earthly and infernal interests behind sacred invocations. In this way, by reducing each tragedy on the planet to the millenarian and simplified tradition of the struggle between Good and Evil, of God against the Devil, hatred, violence and death are legitimated. There is no other way to explain how men and women are inclined to pray with fanatical pride and hypocritical humility, as if they were pure angels, models of morality, all the while hiding gunpowder in their clothing, or a check made out to death. And if the leaders are aware of the fraud, their subjects are no less responsible for being stupid, no less culpable for their criminal metaphysical convictions, in the name of God and Morality – when not in the name of a race, of a culture - and from a long tradition, recently on exhibit, custom-fit to the latest in hatred and ambition.

The analysis of the “origin of violence” would be useless if it were produced and consumed only within a university. It should be a problem for the headlines, a problem to be discussed dispassionately in the bars and in the streets. At the same time, we will have to recognize, once again, that we need a genuine dialogue. Not a return to the diplomatic farce, but a dialogue between peoples who have begun dangerously to see one another as enemies, as threats – a disagreement, really, based on a profound and crushing ignorance of the other and of oneself. What is urgent is a painful but courageous dialogue, where each one of us might recognize our prejudice and our self-centeredness. A dialogue that dispenses with the religious fanaticism – both Muslim and Christian – so in vogue these days, with its messianic and moralizing pretensions. A dialogue, in short, to spite the deaf who refuse to hear.
Resource Center of the Americas: Working for Human Rights in the Global Community

Blaise Pascal (1623 - 1662) was by no means allowed to rest in peace. He was considered a heretic and, hence, his grave was violated several times by his Catholic adversaries. An account of this can be found ...

The Conversion of Blaise Pascal: A Baroque Novel [Excerpt, PDF]


D. M. Ludwin
Fragment 65


Blaise Pascal ~ Wikipedia
* * *
Pascal was a Catholic in his earlier life but I'm not so sure about later. Dan Barker deconverted to atheism and wrote the following in his book, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist.

Pascal's Wager

God can't be proved. But if God exists, the believer gains everything (heaven) and the unbeliever loses everything (hell). If God doesn't exist, the believer loses nothing and the unbeliever gains nothing. There is therefore everything to gain and nothing to lose by believing in God. ~ Blaise Pascal

"This argument, first formulated by French philosopher Blaise Pascal, is sheer intimidation. It is not a case for a god's existence: it is an argument for belief, based on irrational fear. With this kind of reasoning we should simply pick the religion with the worst hell.

"It is not true that the believer loses nothing. We diminish this life by preferring the myth of an afterlife, and we sacrifice honesty to the maintenance of a lie. Religion demands time, energy and money, draining valuable human resources from the improvement of this world. Religious conformity, a tool of tyrants, is a threat to freedom.

"Nor is it true that the unbeliever gains nothing. Rejecting religion can be a positive liberating experience, gaining perspective and freedom of inquiry. Freethinkers have always been in the forefront of social and moral progress.

"What kind of person would eternally torment an honest doubter? If their god is so unjust, then theists are in as much danger as atheists. Perhaps god will get a perverted thrill from changing his mind and damning everyone, believers and unbelievers alike. Or, inverting the gamble, perhaps god will only save those who have enough courage not to believe!

"Pascal was a Catholic and assumed that the existence of god meant the Christian God. However, the Islamic Allah might be the true god, which turns Pascal's wager into a riskier gamble than intended.

"In any case, a belief in a deity based on fear is not a belief that produces admiration. It does not follow that such a being deserves to be worshipped.

"(See Chapter 12, "What If You're Wrong?" in Losing Faith In Faith: From Preacher To Atheist for a more comprehensive response to Pascal's Wager.)"

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Thursday, November 23, 2006

* Thanksgiving, No Thanks

1916 Panoramic view of California Indians

~ BlogHer: Thanksgiving day is traditionally a Christian holiday with adherents of other religions giving thanks to their particular brands of gods. But millions of people celebrate without images of supernatural beings giving thanks for and to other people instead. For America's Indians, however, it is a day of mourning the massacre of countless people by Christians "founding" the country and the continuing discrimination that they suffer. And so ...

Text of Plaque on Cole's Hill
Since 1970, Native Americans have gathered at noon on Cole's Hill in Plymouth to commemorate a National Day of Mourning on the US Thanksgiving holiday. Many Native Americans do not celebrate the arrival of the Pilgrims and other European settlers. To them, Thanksgiving Day is a reminder of the genocide of millions of their people, the theft of their lands, and the relentless assault on their culture. Participants in a National Day of Mourning honor Native ancestors and the struggles of Native peoples to survive today. It is a day of remembrance and spiritual connection as well as a protest of the racism and oppression which Native Americans continue to experience.



Photos from Wikipedia
“God’s signs,” George W. Bush declared, “are not always the ones we look for. We learn in tragedy that his purposes are not always our own...Neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth can separate us from God’s love. May he bless the souls of the departed, may he comfort our own, and may he always guide our country.”
That was said on September 14, 2001, three days after the World Trade Center horror. Reverend Bush's sermon made me feel even worse.

I absolutely believe what Ellie [Contact] believes--that there is no direct evidence, so how could you ask me to believe in God when there's absolutely no evidence that I can see?

~ Jodie Foster

I don't believe in Heaven and Hell," he says. "I don't know if I believe in God. All I know is that as an individual, I won't allow this life--the only thing I know to exist--to be wasted.

~ George Clooney

TIME: Quote of the Day

Vigilance when traveling ...

codepinkalert.org



ATHEISTS ~ BRIEF LIST

Steve Allen Woody Allen Susan B. Anthony Lance Armstrong Isaac Asimov Irving Berlin Ray Bradbury Marlon Brando Warren Buffett Richard Burton George Carlin Dick Cavett Charlie Chaplin Arthur C. Clarke Richard Dawkins Phyllis Diller Walt Disney Dr. Dean Edell Thomas Edison Larry Ellison Larry Flynt Henry Ford Bill Gates Stephen Hawking Robert Heinlein Ernest Hemingway Katharine Hepburn Molly Ivins Larry King Tom Leykis Barry Manilow Henry Miller Jack Nicholson Florence Nightingale Madalyn Murray O'Hair George Orwell Penn & Teller Ayn Rand Ron Reagan Jr. Christopher Reeve Gene Roddenberry Carl Sagan Charles Schultz Neil Simon Howard Stern Linus Torvalds Ted Turner Mark Twain Jesse Ventura Bruce Willis Steve Wozniak Frank Lloyd Wright Celebrity Atheists

Must Read Books ...







NOTICE

YOU HAVE REACHED THE END OF THE INTERNET. CLICK HERE
TO START OVER.

IN CASE YOU'VE EVER WONDERED WHAT THE END OF THE
INTERNET LOOKS LIKE, VOILA! CLOSING UP SHOP: